Jump to content

OfficialZeeVo

Members

About OfficialZeeVo

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Recent Profile Visitors

505 profile views
  1. Nothing really ground breaking on what you selling. Tell me if you get any good airdrop weapons and I will give prices.
  2. How many rounds per magazine?
  3. Transitions give me a bit of a headache but really good frags. Just use jumpcuts mans.
  4. Overall it was justified I was just filling in because I thought I had to disagree. I was banned and I apologise and will not do again.
  5. OfficialZeeVo

    ZeeVo

    In-game name: ZeeVo Steam ID: 76561198115559695 Date of ban: 05/26/20 Staff member that banned you: Outsyder Reason for ban: FailRP - Not giving enough time in initiation. Why do you think you were banned: I was banned for not giving enough time to another player when initiating upon him. Do you believe your ban was unjustified, if so explain why: I believe it was unjustified to a degree as I was given a 6-month ban. I had to ask Bensi to help as OutSyder was non-compliant. Only when Bensi came did he lower it to a 1 month when I had no history of fail RP. The ban was also unjustified as the civilian attempted to enter a hatchback sport which I reasoned was him attempting to evade. I then fired, this warranted a ban. The player clearly didn't value his life and a chance to compensate the player was not given. In a normal case, the players would just discuss in TS and the situation would be over. If you believe your ban was justified why should you be unbanned: I believe my ban was justified due to the fact I should give players more time to comply however I did fire upon him early as he began to run and face the passenger side of a hatchback sport which made me believe he was going to enter the vehicle. I have never been banned for Fail RP before and in this rare case, I do apologise sincerely. I did offer to compensate the player however that was not necessary. Where there any extenuating circumstances that contributed to your ban: Previous bans: Toxicity - Stating that another player was violating me in a homosexual manner in roleplay Exploit - Trying to vault through a prison wall RDM - Had been dealt with. Waiting for removal on my record Please confirm you've read & understood the rules Yes Please confirm you understand there is no timeframe Yes
  6. OfficialZeeVo

    ZeeVo

    In-game name: ZeeVo Steam ID: 76561198115559695 Date of ban: 05/25/20 Staff member that banned you: Outsyder Reason for ban: FailRP - Not giving enough time in initiation. Why do you think you were banned: I was banned for not giving enough time to another player when initiating upon him. Do you believe your ban was unjustified, if so explain why: I believe it was unjustified to a degree as I was given a 6-month ban. I had to ask Bensi to help as OutSyder was non-compliant. Only when Bensi came did he lower it to a 1 month when I had no history of fail RP. The ban was also unjustified as the civilian attempted to enter a hatchback sport which I reasoned was him attempting to evade. I then fired, this warranted a ban. The player clearly didn't value his life and a chance to compensate the player was not given. In a normal case, the players would just discuss in TS and the situation would be over. If you believe your ban was justified why should you be unbanned: I believe my ban was justified due to the fact I should give players more time to comply however I did fire upon him early as he began to run and face the passenger side of a hatchback sport which made me believe he was going to enter the vehicle. I have never been banned for Fail RP before and in this rare case, I do apologise sincerely. I did offer to compensate the player however that was not necessary. Where there any extenuating circumstances that contributed to your ban: Previous bans: Toxicity - Stating that another player was violating me in a homosexual manner in roleplay Exploit - Trying to vault through a prison wall RDM - Had been dealt with. Waiting for removal on my record. Please confirm you've read & understood the rules Yes Please confirm you understand there is no timeframe Yes
  7. I mean using a Mk1 and peeking is allowed. Fuel confirmed it a couple weeks ago.
  8. No that is allowed. Happened to me and had Staff say that it's fine. Okay this argument is kind of pointless because it is focused on one of the points I made but it was one of my weakest points man. Why does it have to be that Cypher is the only gang that can contest. It's not fair that 10+ player gangs always have to win. It's not based on skill and is not fun. My way of managing warzone basically doesn't hurt any factions so I really don't understand why we are stil talking about this. If you want to contest my manner of fixing warzone that tiered warzones is not helpful by no means contest that point but I feel like I am fighting a point I don't really care about anyway.
  9. Alright I will account AJ which made a point he has already made but Steffex just said Cypher doesn't have 15 members how is that against me?
  10. I never guessed. Everything I have said is true and evidence can be given if needed. I am trying to ask for the community's opinion not representing the community so I can be biased if needed however I am just stating that BW is biased and nobody apart from BW is opposing my arguments. Could you explain that?
  11. I meant warzone sorry it's late. Hmm. If the developers want to deny this post I don't mind it's about the community. If you think that warzone shouldn't be changed I don't mind but so far the only people challenging my point is BW and they can be incredibly biased at times from my experience.
  12. Alright look at next gang wars btw cypher said they are getting 20 members on lmao.
  13. Would be nice as a way to counter sharking ignoring it's weight as a gameplay mechanic. Makes underwater combat more fun.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use & Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.